Latest News
The lady who framed a Judge and a Journalist for sexual assault
“We are looking for something like allegations of sexual assault, tax evasion, etc.”
Michelle Van der Merwe concerning retired SCA Judge Fritz Brand
Antony Mostert & Another v Simon John Nash, Paul Robert O’Sullivan, Sarah-Jane Trent & Others
“[98] Moreover, the forensic report does not contain facts and the averments that the forensic report does contain are substantially false. The respondents do not make out a case that the contents of any future version of the forensic report will be different or anything other than substantially untrue.
[99] The respondents’ statements regarding the applicants reflect an absence of concern on the part of the respondents, not only with the truth or correctness of those statements but also with the language used to express them.”
The Late Koos van der Merwe MP, concerning his granddaughter Michelle
“In other words, what I mean is that I don’t believe her. I told her, “Michelle you are a liar. You are fabricating these things. What the hell is wrong with you. But now, Michelle, that you have decided to take the warpath, we will meet you here. We will fight you from now on. You are impossible, and the only way to deal with you in ‘hard’. You go to court and there will be lawyers who will crucify you. You are a psychological person, with a history of psychological problems, you have A, B, C, D, E, and F. You have been to Dendron. You are a troublemaker. You are a liar. You are going to go to court? Fine! We will meet you there. We will destroy you. You will never become a lawyer after this.”
– Koos Van der Merwe, MP
Neil Diamond v Paul O’Sullivan and Annelien van der Walt
“”29 From the tone and content of the first respondents threats and his past conduct and ‘name’ that he has made for himseif in the media, it is clear that he is a self-appointed vigilante who has taken it upon himself the self-appointed right and duty to root out crime wherever, in his subjective opinion, crime manifests itself. He does not claim any appointment under the faw to have this task. He does not claim any rationale beyond the reason for his picking the various persons that he chooses to target for his alleged crime fighting activities. Indeed, bereft, for the most part, of any admissible evidence, he chooses to threaten and intimidate his targets to achieve his own end. He also, quite evidently, enjoys publicity in the press for his self-appointed “white knight” activities.
30 It will be submitted that it is evident that the first respondent is emotionally unstable and believes himself to hold some special place in society where the ordinary rules of societal conduct do not apply to him. Persons such as Mr O’Sullivan are quite evidently dangerous in society if left unchecked””
Paul O’Sullivan: The Face of a Wife-Beater and Liar
“He (Paul O’Sullivan) then walked away, stopped, and walked back to Odette (his wife) and smacked her through her face with an open palm. She fell on the ground.”
“Upon returning home, I (Odette) noticed that Mr Paul O’Sullivan had damaged my motor vehicle, a Ford Fiesta, registration. Number 767 FLY GP. He scratched the word “SLUT” on the right rear door of my motor vehicle.”
